F'n 8ing[!]

 [Original intent:  FOOTNOTES PAGE TWO OCTOBER 2014 ]
10-27-14: The Age of Fed Upism TRYAngel8ing to CNN (FN?) Epicyclical Poet Tree , Punderous Ponderings , C? D? Gitmo or less.

NOTE: BlogSpot Change in Scheduling OpShuns.  i.e. No BL8ted change of D8s..**
(FNx)=Footnotes Pages(FN1,2,3,! ? x...) 

CALM PEN DIUM [!] OF SORTS.*
RE: F'n~/= ... furc8ing ! ...

** Footnotes Page One.
Footnotes Page Two
Footnotes Page Three
(FN?)

*To sort later (CALM PEN DIUM)
** bifurcation of irritation C~Note.

Monopsony? Huff Poe M-barrassmeant? 
Smerconish.  x-finity appropos.  Type-Oh. (-/-)
Economic FX! [Where's the ticket? <=still parsing ...  ! ?
NOTE: still parsing C-Type-Oh.
// Still footnoting: Who Let the Dogs Out?, (~ /~)  The Last Try Pod [!] (-/-)
2reids...  [- / -] Punderous Ponderings, b, c, d, e ~/~ Un-Exceptionalism , f.

FOOTNOTES MARCH 2013

3-14-13 : interesting digs Six Links
(b.s.) "S.E.(vi)" A. (fn)FOR D... , B. i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy , C. ROW MAN #Sign [Numeral (i)]. 
(b.s.) "Six Sigma" A. No Frackin' Way (sc) ... E. Rocket Man?[!] ... I. Over Helming. (sc).
un M bed Ed (sc) ?[!] {?}

3-18-13:  Not to leave it, or pun on SNL: nor love it.  R we LOL in the same boat? As for Heading
*: dimentionalism(sic) -
lede : (b.s.)tetra+heed+run - A.,B.,C.,D.,G.,H.,I.
or : (b.s.) lede+or+ship - A., ... . N. Walking the Plank[!] (s.c.)
ship : (b.s.) share+n+angle -
? : (b.s.) tetrahedron of will -
focus : (b.s.) Hume  A. Third Times a Charm. B. He said *a fowl*!
on :  (b.s.) Hume+or+us  / Humorism
Pythagorean : Pythagorean - A Place to Ponder
Socratic :  Socratics. - (b.s.)Kant+Hegel
published today 3-18-13

3-20-13 Curve Balls?  (b.s.)Curve+Balls: A., B., C., D. /  Original Intent and Spin.

3-22-13  Scroll over, and only "Physics" had been read at time of post. Post Physics? / Un Try
Angles? 

3-28-13 Absolut(ist)ly - "clothing" (b.s.)robin+hood: RawMoney Runnin', Genre Clash (sc),  Fair and Balanced... (sc) / divide**: At what point is (pun and rap on justice/scales and founding docs) / "absolutist"(b.s.)absolutism : At what point is , Primary Boogeyman.  / win or lose (b.s.)former(pop+culture): A.(sc), B., C., D., E., F., G., Slash Segue(sc), The Billy Club...(sc), A generous dia-Gnosis.(sc).,  FAUX CULTIAN? (sc), Close Enough for(sc),  Pluto, Plato, and the Pen Dull'em, M(m)., N(n), Pluto, Plato, and the Pen Dull'em, P., Q.(q).  latter (b.s.)boogeyman: Primary Boogeyman, B., C., Bottom Line Update(sc), Juxta-Boogey (sc)
VFW:Virtue Freedom War?  Rhetoric, Logic, Grammar ? [!]

FOOTNOTES FEBRUARY 2013

2-1-13 Trilemmas and Cultural Calculus :
Fishkin's http://www.philosophy-of-education.org/uploads/papers2011/Bamfield.pdf, Trilemma http://www.utm.edu/staff/jfieser/class/410-pol/pojman-outline.htm, 4M Try Lemmings,
in tent  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trilemma, Mean  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trilemma#Trilemmas_in_economics,
...   http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/business/economy/11view.html?_r=0,
?  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trilemma#Trilemmas_in_economics, ?  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_paradox,
easy  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetralemma, at  http://www.thelogician.net/3b_buddhist_illogic/3b_chapter_01.htm,
least  http://forum.wolframscience.com/showthread.php?s=16f6647f676b31bf8e738901daabc68a&threadid=1927,
loosely  http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=tetrahedron+of+will,
drafting  http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=math+is+next+,
un- http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=math+is+next,
M  http://www.facebook.com/roger.larson.58/timeline/2013/1,
bedding  http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=godliness,
tan http://www.facebook.com/roger.larson.58/timeline/2013/1#!/JohnHenryLG/posts/484801448229006?comment_id=5254201&offset=0&total_comments=13,
gent  http://www.facebook.com/roger.larson.58/timeline/2013/1#!/suzette.sommer.9/posts/4281975535675?comment_id=57783597&offset=0&total_comments=29 *,
shall  http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2012/07/david-and-goliath.html,
2-4-13 *source or 4moolah 4  the platonic 4M.

2-4-13 Quoth the...
Brackets and the Debt Clock under the "birds"(sc)
not : (b.s  pen+dull+em) a Pluto, Plato, and the Pen Dull'em (sc), b Failure is always (sc), c Go Left Young Man! , d  Slippery Slope (sc).
else: (b.s. poe) Fair and Balanced... (sc)

2-5-13 Flack...Oh
and blame : War on Tea Party?
  gaming. (b.s. share+n+angle) Mitt's BO*Son, BlogSpot Has A New "Blogger", Try Lemmings, Bring It On!, Cautious Black Friday!!!!, Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie!, "FACT: References To Al Qaeda Were Removed To Protect National Security ...", War of the Skirts, The Hope'd4 Campaign, Who Let the Dogs Out?, Clinton(Bill) is full of B.S. .

2-11-13 Owe(b.s)= Post-Pyth, Post-Pyth, Post "don't ask, don't tell"^ ? (d'oh=sc),Post "don't ask, don't tell"^ ?  / OW=?(under al gore rhythm of pyth)4 later search or earlier brackets ! (Ctrl F "hood")

2-12-13 update, *FP4*, *FP3*, LEGEND PAGE, Format Change , Updates
2-12-13 Carpe Diem! Seize the Day? Latin 4...

2-13-13  D-Day *seams* = pun on *sowing* seems to thread in Lincoln and Darwin's birthday.  Further, I should let you work it "into the grand picture of how things work".(FP2)

2-14-13 SOTU label/[**] & subheading edit after Tea Kettle Sports[!]
TKS[!]: Fry/Pan{L} pun on gaming politics.(OW) you(sc) Hint: NCAA/Olypics/CAPitalization[!]
(b.s.)"PBMP" A.,  B.What the Beck? (sc), C. Follow-up and Flip-Flop (sc)  D. Follow-up and Flip-Flop  E. Proof of Process? F. Looking Back, and Moving On. (sc) G. Geometry of Purpose (sc) N F L [!] (F P too?)

2-15-13  HAPPY V-DAY!  Note the anachronism of con sciousness & science.

2-18-13 Technical Difficulties!   "Where": A. Follow-up (sc) , B. What Obama can't say. (sc), C. What the Beck? (sc)  /   "inter": Score Won...  / "tubes": A. As the Inner Tubes (sc) , B. Table of Contents  (Senator)
** "Rush"(pun) / "ah!": A. WTF?, B. The Hope, C. Why OWS is bigger than Left vs. Right. (sc)
"foundations": A. Science Fiction Writers, B. Four More Years!, C. Slash Segue (sc), D. Notes from Al-Qaeda .

2-19-13 Splitting Rails... to
"Share": Technical Difficulties! 
"'n": HAPPY V-DAY! 
"Angles.": Garry Wills "(c)atholicism" The Cycle
"Not ": (b.s.)"yogurt" C. Pop Yogurt[!]
"just": Harvard class on Tarantino.
"President's": ladders of opportunity
"pastime": Three Shed Monte 

2-23-13: OW?  Unspinning Charlotte! 6., 5.(Wills), 4.Future Bubble?, 3.(b.s.), 2., 1. Gnaught ?  [FP2]

2-26-13 under(stands?) or PEG legs?
Preface to FOOTNOTES OCTOBER 2012, Simon says... , The History of B.S.,
What the Beck?  BS-Table?

2-28-12 ...SCrolls: Lap Top?  No Tab Let's. Krauthammer / Walsh (Breaking Bread?)(FP3)

Caution: Expletive...

Journalism: Doesn't add up.

Maybe the Exit Strategy does not add up, but I mean that it may have been McChrystal's and Obama's as far as an Afghan Exit Strategy.

UPDATE TO THE SIDEBAR:
Obama = Getter R Done
Understanding the Obama Doctrine*
Counter Evolutionary (R,R,R)
Open Source Intelligence
Navigation: Ctrl F[**]
[Bold links are the side bar links, the unbold are unembedded links, comments or labels. These include: Rachel Maddow on Obama's Successes, Brzezinski on Morning Joe, Social Security Works on the Deficit Commission, Stockman on Taxing, and Navigation* Search.]
* yet to label and add MSNBC: The Ed Show, Olbermann and Ratigan/Matthews
[**] Huzzah!

Go Left Young Man!

The Pre-Midterm Mandate: The Ed Effect!
Pragmatic Pen Dull Em?
Mass a Choose Its!
Randslide!

Just in! To which I have preemptively addressed in the form of a constitutional "Ctrl F" for "freedom" and "commerce" in that the answer is in the first amendment, if one is not a Utopian reader, it concludes with the freedom..."to petition the Government for a redress of grievances". i.e. Commerce is under the legislative article and "A Republic if you can keep it" and if one can preamble.

[Go West Young Man?]

Try Lemmings

Trigger No Metrics!

If the pen is mightier than the sword, the keyboard is a bacteria*. 

* I will refrain from second guessing, wikipeddling or digging up my Genetics textbook. (It is close enough for government work.)

[Note: saved in draft as time stamped, but released @12:50 PM unedited**, linked or labeled.]
** not to drag lemmings in, only the "Political Calculus" or "cultural calculus" and share n' angle'n.

INET

Joseph Stiglitz: Economics Has to Come to Terms with Wealth and Income Inequality
Xavier Gabaix: NFRY / PC

While reading the first I imagined a curve representing a tipping point and it's margins.  I also considered that dominoes can tip either way, but that is not the game called Dominoes. Then I properly applied the Laffer Curve but thought of a gulch of sorts.  (Ctrl F. Newtonian: not to mention 3-body problems.)  See PC and NFRY.  THE POINT ? [!] (Poe Pen dull  em?)

12-20-14
The mess ~ age is the message.  Not knot (~) exactly [!]
Fail fast/Bohemian Gravity/Enantiodromia=2#/8th. (Bohemian Irony Dimensions ... ?)

Pluto, Plato, and the Pen Dull'em

On Competition, Cooperation, and Coordination, in Context.*

* the thread here is not PC, but Progressive Culture or Pop('in) Culture

Rootnote: Conservative Theme?

Failure is always

an ingredient of progress. Perfection is always a failure. (Overwhelming superiority and the best and brightest of intentions* aside.)

* parsing and puns or Pen Dull'em [**]aside there are important dynamics involved

[**] 5-29-10 Err at'm to my original swing

More Gill Let?

More Flex-balls ?
Fertil~ized ?
More Cowbell?

M: Tale of Two Bullies!Tale of Two Bullies!, C:O/ Caging Godzillas , W/ On the level...
F: (*)Carry On Comment!, Perspectivism, The Other Debates, Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie! , Whistle Blowing in the Dark?, Z: Neo-changian? , (*)Recycling Trash, Here We Go Again, D&R Tan ya?, ?: Too Random...
or: A? Anticipation Project ^, P? Politics Local and National
FB? The Guardian?

[image tbi ] 

more cowbell









[image tbi ]  ( )

[finally/gnot exactly]
[But a D'R win of some de men shun.]






i. Bury the lede?
e. i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy

NFRY~(not fully rel8d yet)
Not 2 B  con`fused ... w/o?
(FN^)  The Other Debates, Perspectivism, Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie!
oar
o.w. / or Pen ta go(~)'N ?

Let Alone... D(R)N~A ?*
   
* Ctrl F~M-beds @ S. .C 
C-O~W[tbK(o)?] nPS?
WTB ? [!] (.  .  .)

No Teddy

No Bully* Pulpit.
Disagreement and innovations.

Main Stream Perspectives:
CBS
ABC
PBS
Huffington Post
Salon
Washington Post
YouTube
Boston Globe
"Contensions?"(sic**)
More Follow Up.

[Mean-while up date*** No Rapture.]

* Mika 1 Joe 0 Are you serious, Joe?

** counter intuitive: Bully Pulpit is a good thing, like American Exceptionalism, unlike the link or the namesake.
*** and I did not see the Herman Cain link before my Teddy reference and there is no relation between my pen name LeRoy-Rogers and the therogersinsitute, nor Newt's middle name (Leroy).
[See ** "Are" yes I may be. Apologies for the multi-dimentionalism again, but in regards to Newt and Libertarianism, I think that it could be called Tea Party Nuance, and Ginrich is attempting to be the Obama of the Right(or the No Labels of the Right), while I am somewhere not between Keith Olbermann and Ed Schultz.]
[Profits verses Prophets(Chris Hedges) and more.

[The square of the esoteric.

Strauss on reading In 1952 Strauss published Persecution and the Art of Writing, commonly understood to advance the argument that some philosophers write esoterically in order to avoid persecution by political or religious authorities. A few readers of Strauss suggest esoteric writing may also seek to protect politics from political philosophy -- the explosive reasoning of which might well shatter fragile opinions undergirding the political order. Stemming from his study of Maimonides and Al Farabi, and then extended to his reading of Plato (he mentions particularly the discussion of writing in the Phaedrus), Strauss proposed that an esoteric text was the proper type for philosophic learning. Rather than simply outlining the philosopher's thoughts, the esoteric text forces readers to do their own thinking and learning. As Socrates says in the Phaedrus, writing does not respond when questioned, but invites a dialogue with the reader, thereby reducing the problems of the written word. One political danger Strauss pointed to was the acceptance of dangerous ideas too quickly by students. This was perhaps also relevant in the trial of Socrates, where his relationship with Alcibiades was used against him.

Ultimately, Strauss believed that philosophers offered both an "exoteric" or salutary teaching and an "esoteric" or true teaching, which was concealed from the general reader. For maintaining this distinction, Strauss is often accused of having written esoterically himself. Moreover he also emphasized that writers often left contradictions and other excuses to encourage the more careful examination of the writing. Leo Strauss's favourite novelist was Jane Austen.[5]

This spin off is from actually reading the previous bold "and more" but is relevant to the Gingrich "Exceptionalism" and Obama practical and incremental. And Platonic Dialogue.(sic)]
[Spell Check Gingrich: left Ginrich for link & search purposes: but note Strauss to Chomsky philosophical dynamism(Wittgenstein) via esoteric Tea Party Gingrich attempt at nuance.]

Now Dat's...

what I am talkin' 'bout.
And I had not even found the latter link before I had this line. But the former link needs updating and post dating.

Here it is:

Tuesday, January 04, 2011
Post Inserted Rough ramble old style.(pen and paper)

NO LABEL (constitutionalist)
Dragnet: names are changed (no association)
Bubble Up(Still) Party
No Champagne, but trickledown of whine.
Private Corps./Adam Smith
History / Our foundation.
Guilt by association, innocent by No.
Social Darwinist[Fundamental wordist}
Free Association, Not a Force.
Free Willie? So who(said)dat?
Play the cards, dealer.

Post-Sub Title: Buddie to remain nameless,
can you (S)paradigm and Party Less.

[The above will stand alone, substantially as originated and linkless so to speak, and for others to Google or search(of blog) themselves.]

NOW FOR THE FOOTNOTES: Who Dat? Chuck Knox. The Saints were no cards but the Seahawks are no joke! Now I will not try to trace back the rest of my ramble, but it is what I had in mind. But I will make a further association. The party to remain nameless, was asked for a label for himself(Constitutionalist). While others may be Tea Party Republicans or Libertarian Free Marketeers, to label or not to label that is the question. Whether is is nobler in the minds... Regardless we can associate 3rd partiers that may or may not associate with a party as having common strains* if not roots.

Note: changed "changes" to changed in ref. to Dragnet line.

BTW: whatever happened to the Gatorade for Carrol? I guess that is for college. But it seams a crack at the changes or no whine team. But in regards to the whine, I know parties that did not think a losing teams should go to the playoffs, but it is the way the rules were made. It is the process that matters whether you like it or not. Results of course matter, but you can't always change them.

*strains: on another thread elsewhere

Not to bury but...

Owe but I did. 

Knot to mention di-Spencered with.*

Con Text
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/01/david-vitter-alan-grayson-bills-101965.html
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/alberteins385842.html

Meta-4's
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/13/busted_10_myths_that_reveal_just_how_dangerous_the_nsa_really_is_partner/?source=newsletter **
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/13/paul_krugman_republicans_are_enemies_of_americas_poor/?source=newsletter

http://www.salon.com/2014/01/13/no_christies_scandal_is_not_like_benghazi_why_the_rights_defense_is_doomed/?source=newsletter
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/13/chris_christies_forgiving_fan_club_why_elite_centrists_will_back_him_all_the_way/?source=newsletter

Salt Lick?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borate
http://inogolo.com/audio/Wittgenstein_4139.mp3


* Having browsed the busted myth and read the Krugman, and contexted the mess, I accidently deleted, so the above is a revamp(Or V-ramp) of sorts, to reprocess later. 

** I may have mitt-flopped the original Salon selections, Akin to progress and chem mystery.

Footnote***--- me: "I like the context you put it in". kNot said yet.  

*** alternet point of deparcher[!]{!}

Parallel Fields. ? (Re: Con Text i.e. GOTO Hegel?)

http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/21113-disimagination-machines-and-punishing-factories-in-the-age-of-casino-capitalism
http://truth-out.org/news/item/21197-noam-chomsky-on-the-legacy-of-ariel-sharon-not-speaking-ill-of-the-dead-imposes-a-vow-of-silence
http://truth-out.org/news/item/21198-fifty-years-later-the-war-on-poverty-working-better-than-the-right-or-left-will-admit
http://truth-out.org/news/item/21199-turkey-in-crisis-understanding-the-erdogan-gulen-split

These I have barely dug into.  And I have left the paddle ING to you.